Reviews for SingleFile
SingleFile by gildas
Review by Firefox user 15950945
Rated 3 out of 5
by Firefox user 15950945, 6 years agoGood idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
1,043 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by sudhakarbhole, 4 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by TOTGB, 7 days agoNever failed me once, a single html page to save my experience is a great feature from SingleFIle. Been using for years and documenting my web journey.
- Rated 5 out of 5by DeadMonk, 17 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20110724, 20 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by antoillo, 25 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19982479, a month ago3 month firefox stuck same situation. Because web pages not connecting eath other and dead across apps service in my android. Now I connected the hook today again now I hope my firefox run with a easy clouded winner.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ti, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by mian196, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19700490, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 20116194, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by zhachy, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by fidgeter, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Nesta, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 20080598, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Nikitamce, 2 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by amir safaee, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Greg, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Rotunie, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by crankyfranky, 3 months agoAmazing. Exactly what is needed. Packed with features and customizable options. The output looks just like the original. It's opensource, private, does not collect any data. Great job developer. One issue I have is that it's downloading to '~/user/Downloads/' instead of the download path set in Firefox.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Irenicus, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Blackbox, 3 months agoSuper useful for saving webpages, like application forms or temporary AI chats!
Tysm! - Rated 5 out of 5by Alphonse, 4 months agoA feature that used to be possible from the web-browser itself, but due to increased web complexity now requires an extension. In that regard, this extension works great, but of course not all interactive elements can be saved offline.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17435250, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by BC, 4 months ago